UN Secretary General Candidacy
Boutros Boutros Ghali from Egypt –the first secretary general (SG) of the United Nations whose name I was aware of, that too for a general knowledge test conducted all over the middle east by the UN. I was in grade 7 or 8; I am not sure. And since this important guy of the world’s uniting confederation was from Egypt – an Arabic speaking country, there was some amount of pride instilled in me.
Then came Kofi Annan from Ghana. He must have been an awfully capable person or why else would the world elect a guy from Ghana? Where? Some African nation we might possibly hear about once in 4 years ‘if’ their team makes it to the football world cup. Capable he probably was – this is what I thought years back when I learnt of the latest SG for the UN. Of course, I wasn’t aware of the criteria involving SG selections.
The first time I was learning about UNESCO, UNICEF, WHO, The Intl Court of Justice and all those, I felt so good thinking someone somewhere was doing good deeds in this world. I was proud to live in this era where all nations were united and there would be no more world wars for a peace-loving UN was present, vigilant, unlike the utter failure ‘the League of Nations’.
Coming here to Dubai in 2003, I got more aware of world politics and current affairs (what with being forced to watch almost only news channels through the day). Only in these recent years was I perceptive of how useless the UN actually is, especially its Security Council.
The war on terror (read ‘the war on Afghanistan’ by the US), the UN arms inspector Hans Blix’s report of the situation of WMD’s in Iraq and finally the offensive on Iraq, to my utter dismay, all this while the UN took a by-passer’s stance. Talk about being disillusioned. I probably should have known that, after all, the long-running Palestine-Israel conflict was the perfect example of their inadequacy.
I was rudely surprised to hear Kofi Annan and his son’s names in the ‘oil for food scheme scam’. How could a person appointed for humanitarian work take bribes (if the allegations were true)?? How badly has corruption affected our world?
Israel’s recent attacks on Lebanon and how long does it take for the UN to respond? Israel says it needs 2 more weeks of butchery and bloodbath before it calls in for a cease-fire and does the UN object?? Probably that’s when I got this sense of déjà vu, like its all happened before, under a different name – the futile League of Nations.
Somewhere along enters the issue of electing a Kofi Annan, ooops sorry, a new SG. Enter Shashi Tharoor, India’s nominee, hailing from the district of Palakkad in state of Kerala. As an Indian, I rejoiced learning his odds were good, but I knew I had to be my skeptical self until the very end.
Yesterday was the fourth and last round of informal voting for the new SG. The results were a real let down. South Korea’s foreign minister Ban-Ki-Moon came ahead of Tharoor in all 4 rounds. The South Korean bagged the support of all of the Security Council members who voted, while Tharoor was voted against by some of them (which can be likened to a veto). Tharoor withdrew from the election; according to the Malayalam radio news, he said ‘withdrawal’ didn’t sounded as bad as ‘failure’.
Now I know why Egypt, why Ghana, why South Korea…why entities from such powerless or insignificant countries. They can be trained as the puppets (a usage from Riverbend’s blog) of the world’s supreme power(s) - on second thoughts, world’s supreme power (read USA) and its tails (Britain & France). On the other hand, if an all important post like the SG got into the hands of a growing country like India, which by the way is still a non-aligned country, what would the puppet masters do when the puppet thought on its own and decided to act on its own?!!? Get it?
Then came Kofi Annan from Ghana. He must have been an awfully capable person or why else would the world elect a guy from Ghana? Where? Some African nation we might possibly hear about once in 4 years ‘if’ their team makes it to the football world cup. Capable he probably was – this is what I thought years back when I learnt of the latest SG for the UN. Of course, I wasn’t aware of the criteria involving SG selections.
The first time I was learning about UNESCO, UNICEF, WHO, The Intl Court of Justice and all those, I felt so good thinking someone somewhere was doing good deeds in this world. I was proud to live in this era where all nations were united and there would be no more world wars for a peace-loving UN was present, vigilant, unlike the utter failure ‘the League of Nations’.
Coming here to Dubai in 2003, I got more aware of world politics and current affairs (what with being forced to watch almost only news channels through the day). Only in these recent years was I perceptive of how useless the UN actually is, especially its Security Council.
The war on terror (read ‘the war on Afghanistan’ by the US), the UN arms inspector Hans Blix’s report of the situation of WMD’s in Iraq and finally the offensive on Iraq, to my utter dismay, all this while the UN took a by-passer’s stance. Talk about being disillusioned. I probably should have known that, after all, the long-running Palestine-Israel conflict was the perfect example of their inadequacy.
I was rudely surprised to hear Kofi Annan and his son’s names in the ‘oil for food scheme scam’. How could a person appointed for humanitarian work take bribes (if the allegations were true)?? How badly has corruption affected our world?
Israel’s recent attacks on Lebanon and how long does it take for the UN to respond? Israel says it needs 2 more weeks of butchery and bloodbath before it calls in for a cease-fire and does the UN object?? Probably that’s when I got this sense of déjà vu, like its all happened before, under a different name – the futile League of Nations.
Somewhere along enters the issue of electing a Kofi Annan, ooops sorry, a new SG. Enter Shashi Tharoor, India’s nominee, hailing from the district of Palakkad in state of Kerala. As an Indian, I rejoiced learning his odds were good, but I knew I had to be my skeptical self until the very end.
Yesterday was the fourth and last round of informal voting for the new SG. The results were a real let down. South Korea’s foreign minister Ban-Ki-Moon came ahead of Tharoor in all 4 rounds. The South Korean bagged the support of all of the Security Council members who voted, while Tharoor was voted against by some of them (which can be likened to a veto). Tharoor withdrew from the election; according to the Malayalam radio news, he said ‘withdrawal’ didn’t sounded as bad as ‘failure’.
Now I know why Egypt, why Ghana, why South Korea…why entities from such powerless or insignificant countries. They can be trained as the puppets (a usage from Riverbend’s blog) of the world’s supreme power(s) - on second thoughts, world’s supreme power (read USA) and its tails (Britain & France). On the other hand, if an all important post like the SG got into the hands of a growing country like India, which by the way is still a non-aligned country, what would the puppet masters do when the puppet thought on its own and decided to act on its own?!!? Get it?
8 Comments:
It is indeed a wonderful feeling when you see a girl that's not stuck on page 29 of the Ahlan magazine.
You have made indeed great judgements. "Veto" as a concept goes beyond common understanding. Well no one can really question the rationale behind it and it seems as absurd as the things happening in the world. The U.S. went against the U.N when it invaded Iraq but then uses the reasoning that other countries (eg Iran) are breaking U.N laws and they have to be stopped.
The actuality of the matter is that no one in this world can really do anything in a right way deemed by them to change this imbalance of power and the unjustness created by the self declared powers.
Well if I ever got back to school and was given an essay question "If I was Prime Minister..." the table of contents would be . . .
1. Radical Actions for Radical Changes.
2. The Secret Bribe Inquest Police.
3. The Secret Secret Inquest Police.
4. Not a fanatical fervour but an identity fervour.
5. Denouncement of the U.N
6. (Secret)
....
There is only but one way for this!
well, ur topic was real food for thought..but the universal unsaid truth remains that UN=U.S....we all know it and acknowledge it but remain mute spectators to the elaborate drama!
as for India's shashi tharoor..i personally opine that we ought to have supported the south korean candidate, and withdrawn ours, cuz it was a sure thing that India would NOT make it to the sg post..why? u have already explained it..if we had supported s.korea's Ban Ki Moon, i think it wud have been a clever and diplomatic way to win the favour of the ASEAN countries and gain superiorty there. wud have also helped us in having an upper hand in the extradition treaty between Malaysia and India...and ofcoure garnering better support from Thailand.
well, dunno if my thoughts are on the right track, but well, just an opinion...
Well Divya, few points addressed but then again attacking the problem with a defeated mentality and conjuring up an escapist solution is not the way to go.
Well how good is compromising when everybody around you is compromising. We either stand for something right or wrong but do not change the right or wrong for the reasons of tact.
We are the second largest growing economy, have the second largest population in the world, but yet we are not and will not be let to even come close to the Security council. Why? Because it's all about the veto, baby!
Finally S.Korea is not a member of ASEAN. And even though they all look the same calling a Korean, a Japanese or even a Filipino is even more worse than calling an Indian a Paki!
yes, soth korea is not a member of ASEAN, but there are bilateral trading agreements of ASEAN with the republic of korea...my point is when we indians anyway knew we wudnt make it to the un sg, why the trouble? might as well have supported an asian candidate and garnered support of asia...a diplomatic step by step approach... though india is a power to reckon with, there is a long way to go as yet!
by the way, its not about just compromising, its all about cleverly compromising with a beneficial perspective, i believe.
by the way,india is the fourth largest economy in the world, preceeded by u.s, china and japan in that respective order...
not to stir up an argument, but i said second largest GROWING economy ;)
Supporting an American dummy?! We want a free thinking world devoid what American's think right!!
hey nijaz, thru nuts'(thats how i call natasha) blog..it has been fun communicating to you on a vital issue...by the way...smart repartee reg the second largest "growing economy" eh???
wow...all this in my backyard [:D]
div, my nick in college is 'nuts' , so neednt bother with the explaination
i havent said much abt the issue coz i simply dont know much abt the whole thing.
interestingly, i keep reading news related to the middle east n the western countries, but not when things have to do with asia n ASEAN n SAARC etc...y flounder n i have the option of keeping my ignorant mouth shut :P
Post a Comment
<< Home